You’re Watching the Wrong Predator

xAI is positioned to become the most formidable hyperscaler on the planet. Until they start building in orbit...then, they'll eclipse all other data center operators completely.

If there’s a carrot that’s often dangled at the start of any data center infrastructure post or conversation, it’s usually an investment figure. Companies or synergistic partnerships are committing billions into the sector overall; but through the lens of that metric, ranking the data centre arms race purely by money committed and GPUs bought isn’t really showing much of the picture.

By those standards, SpaceX’s/Elon’s offering under xAI looks like a minnow swimming with whales. Microsoft, Amazon, Google and Meta are currently each pouring tens of billions into capacity. xAI is the newcomer with the edgy chatbot that appears on X for a bit of context testing (or Twitter, for millennials and older – we all still call it Twitter, don’t worry). Grok is seen as a novelty - a side project which is easy to file under “small AI lab” and move on.

I think that’s a huge mistake though. I completely understand why it appears like this at the moment, but if anything about SpaceX’s record IPO has taught us, there’s as much belief into Elon’s capability as there ever has been.

The reason xAI gets underestimated is that it isn’t really chasing the same prize as everyone else. It’s not optimising Grok for mass-market consumer release the way OpenAI is with ChatGPT. Similarly, they’re not positioning for enterprise like Anthropic are doing with Claude. Their market destination is ‘embodied’ AI, such as the the brain for Tesla’s Optimus robot – and frankly, it’s a market that simply isn’t here yet (or not at any significant scale yet).

The attention stays elsewhere, on the companies shipping products you can poke at today. Meanwhile the infrastructure underneath xAI is being built by a man who treats “impossible on that timeline” as a personal challenge. Forget the newly advertised ‘trillionaire’ net worth for a second too, because ironically the valuation is a distraction. Roughly as much money has been collectively or cumulatively shovelled into data centre construction by his rivals anyway – so his advantage isn’t monetary.

What Elon has that the others don’t is a set of ludicrously unfair advantages no other operator has any real experience wielding.

---

Power to the people who build their own

Start with the one constraint that decides everything in this industry: electricity. I’ve written before that the grid is the actual bottleneck, not the tech, not the money,, nor the planning. It’s that all of the other operators are stuck in the same queue. Connection waits stretch for years, and when developers need turbines they’re lining up behind each other for GE Vernova or Kawasaki, usually hiring the same handful of consultants to tell them what they already know.

Elon doesn’t queue. When the grid couldn’t feed his Memphis Colossus site fast enough, xAI wheeled in a fleet of methane gas turbines, somewhere around thirty-five of them, and simply ran the thing anyway while the permits caught up. He’s run factories off generators before. He’s built the Raptor engine. Rocket science is the family business, so the idea that building a steam turbine to make his own electricity would faze him is laughable. Where everyone else sees a power problem that needs outside help, he sees an engineering task he’s already solved in a harder domain.

This is the bit that should genuinely worry the incumbents. To be fair, Amazon has comparable muscle here, on paper at least. It has the capital, the logistics and some similar engineering knowledge through Blue Origin. What it doesn’t have is quite the same level of risk appetite, or the speed at refining manufacturing efficiencies. The same tools, but completely different temperament.

---

Bigger, and half-empty on purpose

The second unfair advantage is Elon’s affinity for scale. Look at the Tesla Gigafactory as an example; hyperscale isn’t a stretch goal for Elon, it actually seems to be his default setting. Doing it bigger than anyone else isn’t a challenge he has to rise to, it’s probably the way he always intended to do it in the first place when he ideated it. Colossus has already grown from a standing start to hundreds of thousands of GPUs, with a million openly being talked about as the target – it wouldn’t surprise me if Elon asks that timeline to be moved up to urgently either.

It’s going to take a bit more insider knowledge, but patternising Elon’s behaviour would suggest there’s likely another avenue which will double his capacity over his competitors for the same cost per square foot.

If you’ve not read ‘The Book of Elon’ by Eric Jorgenson, I’d recommend it (he’s also being doing podcast as part of the promotion for it too, so I’d recommend checking some of those out aswsell). A key finding in that is how Elon is willing to push efficiency and design to it’s limits, and he hates too much redundancy built into things – he sees it wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary if something if well designed and durable in the first place.

Most operators of data centers build everything and run it at half capacity – keeping the other half as a redundancy backup.

But I’d bet good money that xAI’s data centres will likely eventually (or may even currently) run with barely any redundancy. Everyone else builds in duplicate, two of everything, because their reputation lives or dies on uptime guarantees to enterprise customers. xAI mostly answers to itself. If a node drops mid-training, it’s just an annoyance, not a breached SLA. Strip out the spare capacity everyone else is contractually forced to carry, and for every square metre of building you’ve effectively got double the usable compute. I can’t prove the redundancy figures from the outside, so treat that as my inference rather than reported fact, but it’s exactly the kind of efficiency he chases everywhere else - cutting the part that isn’t earning its keep.

---

The warm-up act

All of that is impressive, and if he hyperscales with a power generation solution with minimum redundancy, he’ll already by running at factorial levels of efficiency that other operators could achieve. But potentially, it’s just the warm-up act.

The headline act is space. SpaceX has now merged with xAI and filed with the regulator for permission to launch a constellation that could eventually run to a million compute satellites, with the first AI satellite design already shown off publicly. The pitch is simple enough: in orbit the sun never sets, so the power is free and constant, and you’re not fighting any community over land, water or grid capacity. The engineering is brutal, cooling in a vacuum is a genuine nightmare, and plenty of serious people think parity with ground-based sites is a decade away rather than two or three years. I’m not claiming the timeline is right – Elon’s timelines have been awry more than once – sometimes for better, but more often not.

SpaceX already runs the world’s busiest rocket launch cadence; bolting a bit of data center deployment into that (in a modularized, proven and repeatable format), and the best thing all of the other data center operators could do is sell up and buy SpaceX shares. Once Elon cracks orbital deployment, every operator still pouring concrete on the ground is competing in a different and slower league. Attempting to fix data centers relationships with the grid if the slow route. Elon will potentially leave the grid behind entirely, and nothing on earth will be able to compete.

This isn’t actually theoretical at all, as he’s already done it with Starlink. The glacial pace that hard cabling telecommunications infrastructure upgrades can’t even begin to compete with the speed that Starlink can be rolled out.

---

The only one who could answer

If anyone is positioned to meet this, it’s Amazon, but at this stage it would seem that it’s not even close. AWS is also the operator with the most to lose, because its whole empire is terrestrial cloud. So Blue Origin filing its own orbital data centre plan, Project Sunrise, should be a no-brainer, and it is happening, but their trouble is the scale and the timing. Blue Origin filed weeks after SpaceX, for fewer than 52,000 satellites against a potential million. That’s a reaction, not a leading strategy.

Amazon has done this before. It speed-ran cloud computing while everyone else dithered and owned the category for fifteen years off the back of moving first. I think it needs to find that same nerve again (and bloody fast), because the window doesn’t stay open once xAI nails infrastructure deployment in orbit. SpaceX’s advantage would compound in the same way that all of Elon’s engineering does – standardized, repeated and iterated. The same playbook that took SpaceX from blowing up rockets to landing them on barges, and Tesla from niche curiosity to the one of the most valuable carmaker on the planet – all from complete blank slates also.

That’s why this is a one-shot. Whoever’s still building data centres the traditional way when that flywheel spins up doesn’t get a second chance to catch the front-runner. They just get lapped.

I’ll caveat all of this the way I caveat every piece oon AI infrastructure rollout - none of this is a problem if the market stays competitive and honest. A ferociously capable operator dragging the whole industry forward is a good thing, right up until it’s the only operator left and gets to set the price of every junction on the network. The healthiest outcome is xAI, Amazon and a handful of others genuinely racing each other into orbit. The worst is everyone waking up to the predator only after it’s already eaten.

In his defence, Elon has always been welcoming of competition, and genuinely seems to push his agenda in pursuit of creating a better humanity. He’s fine being one of a few operators in any space. But this is no longer at just the direction of Elon; there’s now a lot of shareholders to answer to – and they are not going to be as welcoming of anything which appears to compromise their investment.

So by all means keep watching Microsoft, Google, Meta, Oracle and Amazon. But don’t forget to watch xAI – or there’s a chance you may end up watching the wrong predator.

TH

---

You may find these of interest: